|
Bipin Adhikari
[Ed. note: This article was originally published in the
Independent Weekly, Kathmandu, July 26-August 1, 2000 Vol X No
23, Wednesday. Bipin Adhikari is a lawyer in Nepal. It is also
available at http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishweekly/independent/11-06/index.htm]
The question-are Kamaiyas or bonded laborers no more
bonded?-is a difficult one due to a number of other unanswered
questions. No social system can be conceived as independent of
culture, context or shared understandings. In fact, Kamaiyas owe
their origin both to our feudal culture and lack of human rights
consciousness down through the years. It is often in the name of
cultural integrity as well as social stability that authoritarian
governments resist democratic reforms based on human rights. That
must precisely have been the reason for the continuity of the
Kamaiya system in Nepal.
The recent declaration of the govern-ment that the bonded
laborers are emancipated is a welcome move. But it is not enough.
In the first place, the Kamaiya system relates with exploitation
of one class of people by another. A single stroke of
governmental declaration cannot put an end to it. It merely
highlights the government's intention to give effect to the
constitutional pledge made by the1990 Constitution in response to
the protest movement recently organized in western Nepal. At its
heart, there is no sense of empower-ment and inner fulfillment.
As such, there is a deep sense of unease about the future.
The Kamaiya system refers to an inhuman modus operandi whereby
adults and children work for the landlords in conditions of
servitude to pay off a debt -usually incurred by a person's
relatives or guardians. The debt is rarely if ever paid off due
to high interest rates charged by the lender. Moreover, the
servitude engendered by the debt can be passed from one
generation to the next within the same family. Additionally, the
system may contain features of slavery where landlords are
allowed by the local custom to acquire or dispose of a Kamaiya
with a view to selling or exchanging him. While this is the
general formulation, the system also has subsystems, peculiar to
each geographical region of western Nepal.
The Kamaiya system found in Kailali may be different from the
system found in Dang in their minute details. Similarly, there
are a lot of agricultural wage earners, also known as Kamaiyas,
who work in the land of others on a prenegotiated basis for the
whole year starting from the Nepali month of Magh. It is a
contract labor system, mutually decided between the landlord and
the laborer, and the parties to the contract are free whether to
renew the contract or not for another period. This arrangement is
definitely different from what has been referred to above. But
even this form of contract labor may assume the character of
bonded labor when the laborer borrows money from the landlord for
any reason and cannot pay on the due date. In the process, the
contract acquires the nature of a bonded labor contract. It
happens frequently because the wage the Kamaiyas receive (whether
the legal minimum wage or otherwise) is not enough to meet their
requirements and they then need loans from the landlord.
It is also necessary to understand that there were plenty of
cases where bonded labor did not involve debt at all. They were
chosen by the laborers on a consensual basis, or on the basis of
lucrative offers made by the landlords. Many laborers preferred
to be a bonded laborer than an ordinary laborer. An ordinary
laborer was not entitled to get additional support, love and care
that a bonded laborer would deserve. It was the responsibility of
the landlord to ensure a proper level of housing, clothing and
food for the bonded laborers. The landlord also used to be under
a duty to provide medical care, marriage expenses, cash or crop
payments for death and birth rituals and other contingencies. It
is still not unlikely to find many bonded laborers in western
Nepal whose alcohol or tobacco needs are borne by the bonded
landlord. The concept of minimum wage did not work there.
Even where debtor-creditor relations were involved, the bonded
laborers enjoyed benefits unknown to others in the labor market.
An ordinary agricultural labor
is not entitled to these claims. He is entitled to the minimum
wage (at least in principle), and the landlord does not have any
social or economic responsibility towards him. His life is in
greater danger because he is without subsistence lands, without
alternative economic security, and the state support system never
existed in Nepal. Even now, the change is very marginal. As such,
the bonded labor system, founded on a feudal setting, had
developed as an institution in the course of many years.
traditional morality protected it, and the religious traditions
of the landlords prevented them from doing injustice and
excesses.
The law needs to be supplemented by social engineering to
reach its social goals. The system of bonded labor in its present
form must be understood in the overall declining economic context
of Nepal which creates not only slavery and a slave-like
situation but also trafficking in girls, debt bondage, the
aggravated daijo system in the Terai region, the commercial
sexual exploitation of children, the practice of untouchability,
and governmental lawlessness and declining social sanctions.
Apparently, the move of the government seems to be a populist
one, and its effect might be dangerous to the agriculture sector.
The Kamaiyas said to be released need food, shelter and a job to
be emancipated from their existing bondage. The human rights
workers in the country are also curious about how the government
is creating alternative employment for them. There must be an
alternative support system. It is strange that there is neither
immediate relief measures nor assurances from the government to
provide them a life of dignity. They now do not have the
protection of the landlords (no matter how feeble it was) or of
the government.
The present euphoria on the emancipation of bonded laborers is
thus going to be rather short-lived.
Posted on 2001-08-17
|