|
Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms
Extrajudicial
Killings in Asia
In India, 17 persons
lost their lives in Tirunelveli Town, South Tamil Nadu in July
1999. This was due to brutal police attack. According to reports,
the deaths were due to injuries suffered due to brutal police
beatings. The victims were Dalits who were participants in a
procession demanding solution to a wage dispute and release of
some workers who were in jail. The police used ÔlathiÕ and
charged and chased them into the nearby river. The more serious
injuries were alleged to have been caused when the police
attacked the swimmers on the head while they were trying to reach
the river banks. The human rights group inquiring into the
incident found an enormous amount of evidence including press
reports,.documents, statements, photographs and video coverage.
Another type of
extra-judicial killings that has been taking place in India is
the ÒencounterÓ killings. The victims of such killings are
usually persons who have been arrested for committing serious
crimes. The victim is then alleged to have tried to escape from
police custody and in the process, was shot by the police. Human
rights groups which have collected evidence of these cases often
have found evidence to question the alleged stories of attempted
escapes. Due to the increase of crime, a mass mood of insecurity
has developed, particularly in the major towns. In this situation
any form of suppression of crimes, even by extra-judicial means,
is accepted by the community. One of the towns where large
numbers of encounter killings have taken place is Mumbai (earlier
known as Bombay).
In Sri Lanka, the extra
judicial killings take many forms. There are over thirty thousand
cases of officially recognised disappearances. A commission
inquiring into cases of disappearances cases has stated that
disappearances in Sri Lanka is simply another name for killings
after arrests. Besides the officially recognised disappearances
of the past, there are also large numbers of disappearances
taking place in the areas where armed conflict is going on. This
is in the North and in the East. There are also many instances
where alleged terrorists taken into custody are later found to
have been killed. Besides these, there are reports from many
parts of the country, of alleged criminals being found dead after
arrest. As in the case of India, the explanation is often that
they have tried to escape arrest or have tried to resist arrest.
However the public perception is that the disposal of persons who
are alleged to be well known criminals, is taking place in this
manner as a way of elimination of criminals.
There are reports from
Nepal, of killings of persons alleged to be Maoist insurgents, or
their sympathisers and family members. These persons are often
arrested and thereafter go missing or are found to be dead. Such
killings are the result of harsh measures adopted to suppress
rebel movements. In recent years, the incidents of disappearance
form custody and extra-judicial killings have become serious
problems in Nepal. The Supreme Court of Nepal has made a few
Habeas Corpus orders, but they have not been complied to by the
state mechanism. Independence of the judiciary and the rule of
law are therefore seriously jeopardised. Besides this there are
also reports about incidents which are similar to encounter
killings in Sri Lanka and Nepal.
There are also reports
from the Philippines of killings after arrests. These are also
killings of alleged criminals and the explanations regarding the
killings are similar to the explanations of the encounter
killings given in countries mentioned above.
Indonesia is another
country where there are many instances of killing of those who
are alleged to be rebels. Even after the fall of the Suharto
regime there are many instances where human rights NGOs have
investigated extra-judicial killings of rebels.
Extra judicial killings
is a matter of serious concern. A matter that needs to receive
greater international attention is the justification of killing
of persons after arrest, either on the grounds thet they belong
to rebel movements or that they are alleged to be serious
criminals. There seems to be a tacit agreement among some law
enforcement agencies that when it comes to serious crimes the
judicial process of fair trial can be dispensed with and that
immediate actions can be taken on their own. Given the large
scale happenings on this score, the attention of the
international community needs to be very much concentrated on
this matter. The abuse of the international doctrines against
terrorists by the law enforcement agencies so as to suspend any
form of legal rights, to persons who are alleged as terrorists
should be condemned by the international forums. This also
applies to anti-crime drives. The anti-crime drives which lead to
justification or suspension of judicial processes could have
extremely serious effects on the society as a whole and lead to
break down of law and order altogether.
Posted on 2001-08-15
|