|
[Ed. Note: following is taken from A
Training Manual for Police on Human Rights edited by N. R.
Madhava Menon and published by the Human Rights Centre of the
National Law School of India University, 1997, Bangalore, India.]
Introduction
A code of conduct for law enforcement officials stating that
all of those who exercise police powers shall respect and protect
human dignity and uphold the human rights of all persons was
adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 17 December
1979.
The assembly recommended to governments that they consider
using the code of conduct in the framework of national
legislation or practice as a body of principles to be observed by
law enforcement officials.
A resolution setting forth the code of conduct (No. 34/169)
stated that the nature of the functions of law enforcement in the
defence of public order and the manner in which these functions
were exercised had a direct impact on the quality of life of
individuals as well as of society as a whole. The assembly said
it was conscious of the important task that law enforcement
officials were performing diligently and with dignity, but it was
aware, nevertheless, of the potential for abuse that the exercise
of such duties entailed.
In addition to exhorting all officers of the law to uphold
human rights, the code of conduct, among other things, prohibits
torture, states that force may be used only when strictly
necessary and calls for full protection of the health of persons
in custody.
Each of the eight articles of the code of conduct is
accompanied by a commentary providing information to facilitate
use of the code within the framework of national legislation or
practice.
The text of the code of conduct is set out below.
Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials
Article 1
Law enforcement officials shall at all times fulfil the duty
imposed upon them by law by serving the community and by
protecting all persons against illegal acts, consistent with the
high degree of responsibility required by their profession.
Commentary
(a) The term "law enforcement officials"
includes all officers of the law, whether appointed or
elected, who exercise police powers, especially the powers of
arrest or detention.
(b) In countries where police powers are exercised by
military authorities, whether uniformed or not, or by state
security forces, the definition of law enforcement officials
shall be regarded as including the officers of such services.
(c) Service to the community is intended to include
particularly the rendering of services of assistance to those
members of the community who, by reason of personal,
economic, social or other emergencies, are in need of
immediate aid.
(d) This provision is intended to cover not only all
violent, predatory and harmful acts but extends to the full
range of prohibitions under penal statutes. It extends to
conduct by persons not capable of incurring criminal
liability.
Article 2
In the performance of their duty, law enforcement officials
shall respect and protect human dignity and maintain and uphold
the human rights of all persons.
Commentary
(a) The human rights in question are identified and
protected by national and international law. Among the
relevant international instruments are the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, the Declaration on the Protection
of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the
United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of
Racial Discrimination, the International Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the
International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of
the Crime of Apartheid, the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Standard Minimum
Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and the Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations.
(b) National commentaries to this provision should
indicate regional or national provisions identifying and
protecting these rights.
Article 3
Law enforcement officials may use force only when strictly
necessary and to the extent required for the performance of their
duty.
Commentary
(a) This provision emphasizes that the use of force by law
enforcement officials should be exceptional. While it implies
that law enforcement officials may be authorized to use force
as is reasonably necessary under the circumstances for the
prevention of crime or in effecting or assisting in the
lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders, no force
going beyond that may be used.
(b) National law ordinarily restricts the use of force by
law enforcement officials in accordance with a principle of
proportionality. It is to be understood that such national
principles of proportionality are to be respected in the
interpretation of this provision. In no case should this
provision be interpreted to authorize the use of force which
is disproportionate to the legitimate objective to be
achieved.
(c) The use of firearms is considered an extreme measure.
Every effort should be made to exclude the use of firearms,
especially against children. In general, firearms should not
he used except when a suspected offender offers armed
resistance or otherwise jeopardizes the lives of others and
less extreme measures are not sufficient to restrain or
apprehend the suspected offender. In every instance in which
a firearm is discharged, a report should be made promptly to
the competent authorities.
Article 4
Matters of a confidential nature in the possession of law
enforcement officials shall be kept confidential unless the
performance of their duty or the needs of justice strictly
require otherwise.
Commentary
By the nature of their duties, law enforcement officials
obtain information which may relate to peoples private
lives or be potentially harmful to the interests, and especially
the reputation, of others. Great care should be exercised in
safeguarding and using such information, which should be
disclosed only in the performance of duty or to serve the needs
of justice. Any disclosure of such information for other purposes
is wholly improper.
Article 5
No law enforcement official may inflict, instigate or tolerate
any act of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment nor may any law enforcement official invoke
superior orders or exceptional circumstances, such as a state of
war or a threat of war, a threat to national security, internal
political instability or any other public emergency, as a
justification for torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.
Commentary
(a) This prohibition derives from the Declaration on the
Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and
Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,
adopted by the General Assembly, according to which:
"[Such an act is] an offence to human dignity and
shall be condemned as a denial of the purposes of the charter
of the United Nations and as a violation of the human rights
and fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (and other international human
rights instruments)."
(b) The declaration defines torture as follows:
". . . [T]orture means any act by which severe pain
or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally
inflicted by or at the instigation of a public official on a
person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third
person information or a confession, punishing him for an act
he has committed or is suspected of having committed or
intimidating him or other persons. It does not include pain
or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to
lawful sanctions to the extent consistent with the Standard
Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners."
(c) The term "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment" has not been defined by the General
Assembly but should be interpreted so as to extend the widest
possible protection against abuses, whether physical or
mental.
Article 6
Law enforcement officials shall ensure the full protection of
the health of persons in their custody and, in particular, shall
take immediate action to secure medical attention whenever
required.
Commentary
(a) "Medical attention," which refers to
services rendered by any medical personnel, including
certified medical practitioners and paramedics, shall be
secured when needed or requested.
(b) While the medical personnel are likely to be attached
to the law enforcement operation, law enforcement officials
must take into account the judgement of such personnel when
they recommend providing the person in custody with
appropriate treatment through, or in consultation with,
medical personnel from outside the law enforcement operation.
(c) It is understood that law enforcement officials shall
also secure medical attention for victims of violations of
the law or of accidents occurring in the course of violations
of the law.
Article 7
Law enforcement officials shall not commit any act of
corruption. They shall also rigorously oppose and combat all such
acts.
Commentary
(a) Any act of corruption, in the same way as any other
abuse of authority, is incompatible with the profession of
law enforcement officials. The law must be enforced fully
with respect to any law enforcement official who commits an
act of corruption as governments cannot expect to enforce the
law among their citizens if they cannot, or will not, enforce
the law against their own agents and within their own
agencies.
(b) While the definition of corruption must be subject to
national law, it should be understood to encompass the
commission or omission of an act in the performance of or in
connection with ones duties in response to gifts,
promises or incentives demanded or accepted or the wrongful
receipt of these once the act has been committed or omitted.
(c) The expression "act of corruption" referred
to above should be understood to encompass attempted
corruption.
Article 8
Law enforcement officials shall respect the law and the
present code. They shall also, to the best of their capability,
prevent and rigorously oppose any violations of them.
Law enforcement officials who have reasons to believe that a
violation of the present code has occurred or is about to occur
shall report the matter to their superior authorities and, where
necessary, to their appropriate authorities or organs vested with
reviewing or remedial power.
Commentary
(a) This code shall be observed whenever it has been
incorporated into national legislation or practice. If
legislation or practice contains stricter provisions than
those of the present code, these stricter provisions shall be
observed.
(b) This article seeks to preserve the balance between the
need for internal discipline of the agency on which public
safety is largely dependent, on the one hand, and the need
for dealing with violations of basic human rights, on the
other. Law enforcement officials shall report violations
within their chain of command and take other lawful action
outside the chain of command only when no other remedies are
available or effective. It is understood that law enforcement
officials shall not suffer administrative or other penalties
because they have reported that a violation of this code has
occurred or is about to occur.
(c) The term "appropriate authorities or organs
vested with reviewing or remedial power" refers to any
authority or organ existing under national law, whether
internal to the law enforcement agency or independent
thereof, with statutory, customary or other power to review
grievances and complaints arising out of violations within
the purview of this code.
(d) In some countries, the mass media may be regarded as
performing complaint review functions similar to those
described in subpara-graph above. Law enforcement officials
may, therefore, be justified if, as a last resort and in
accordance with the laws and customs of their own countries
and with the provisions of Article 4 of the present code,
they bring violations to the attention of public opinion
through the mass media.
(e) Law enforcement officials who comply with the
provisions of this code deserve the respect, the full support
and the cooperation of the community and of the law
enforcement agency in which they serve as well as the law
enforcement profession.
Posted on 2001-08-14
|